<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for microphonereviews.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microphonereviews.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microphonereviews.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shure Beta 58A by Zachariah</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonereviews.com/wireless-microphones/shure-beta-58a.html#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachariah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.microphonereviews.com/?p=159#comment-83</guid>
		<description>If your going wireless, I would say the Beta. The reveiw makes it clear that its more responsive then the SM. But your daughter is a Female vocalists and with female vocalists ive found that the Beta 87 does wonders. Although that may be out of your budget range. Never hurts to look into it. Definatly do Beta and if you can Beta 87.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your going wireless, I would say the Beta. The reveiw makes it clear that its more responsive then the SM. But your daughter is a Female vocalists and with female vocalists ive found that the Beta 87 does wonders. Although that may be out of your budget range. Never hurts to look into it. Definatly do Beta and if you can Beta 87.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shure Beta 58A by Zachariah</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonereviews.com/wireless-microphones/shure-beta-58a.html#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachariah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.microphonereviews.com/?p=159#comment-82</guid>
		<description>null</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>null</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blue Bluebird by James</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonereviews.com/microphones/condenser-microphones/blue-bluebird.html#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 13:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.microphonereviews.com/?p=62#comment-80</guid>
		<description>A tip for using the shockmount: if you turn the mic upside-down the weight of the thing actually tightens the screw instead of loosening it. And yeah, the pop filters suck - one of mine was bent when I received it and when I bent it back into shape it snapped.
&#160;
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tip for using the shockmount: if you turn the mic upside-down the weight of the thing actually tightens the screw instead of loosening it. And yeah, the pop filters suck &#8211; one of mine was bent when I received it and when I bent it back into shape it snapped.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony ECMMS907 by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonereviews.com/product-reviews/camcorder-microphones/sony-ecmms907.html#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.microphonereviews.com/?p=59#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Can this mic be used &quot; live&quot;&#160;for live performances,&#160;to mic up an acoustic guitar or a ukulele player?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can this mic be used &quot; live&quot;&nbsp;for live performances,&nbsp;to mic up an acoustic guitar or a ukulele player?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shure Beta 58A by computerworkstationdesk.com</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonereviews.com/wireless-microphones/shure-beta-58a.html#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>computerworkstationdesk.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.microphonereviews.com/?p=159#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Excellent post ! keep up the good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post ! keep up the good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shure SM57 by TechnologyReviewSite</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonereviews.com/product-reviews/condenser-microphones-product-reviews/shure-sm57.html#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>TechnologyReviewSite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.microphonereviews.com/?p=73#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of the stuff you said here but I didn&#039;t think that the mic was great for vocals, definitely more of an instrumental mic. Don&#039;t you think an SM58 would be better for vocals then the SM57?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of the stuff you said here but I didn&#039;t think that the mic was great for vocals, definitely more of an instrumental mic. Don&#039;t you think an SM58 would be better for vocals then the SM57?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blue Bluebird by eric</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonereviews.com/microphones/condenser-microphones/blue-bluebird.html#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.microphonereviews.com/?p=62#comment-58</guid>
		<description>the bluebird definitely provides rich recordings but I find vocal recordings sometimes too base heavy, and in need of EQ. &#160;I would compare it to the sound of AM radio talk shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the bluebird definitely provides rich recordings but I find vocal recordings sometimes too base heavy, and in need of EQ. &nbsp;I would compare it to the sound of AM radio talk shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shure Beta 58A by Gary Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonereviews.com/wireless-microphones/shure-beta-58a.html#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 02:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.microphonereviews.com/?p=159#comment-51</guid>
		<description>I am thinking of buying a wireless mic for my daughter as a gift.&#160; She is a lead singer from Nashville.&#160; I have very little knowledge in this area but was told the Shure SM58 is a good one.&#160; Should I look at Beta?&#160; I don&#039;t know the difference.&#160; She performs in singer/songwriter venues, large outdoor concerts and everything in between.&#160; Also, I was told to look into the Airline Synth Wireless systme and use it with the SM58.&#160; Does this make sense, and can you give me a suggestion as to what sytem or mic to look at.&#160; (Budget is a concern)..........Thanks,&#160; Gary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thinking of buying a wireless mic for my daughter as a gift.&nbsp; She is a lead singer from Nashville.&nbsp; I have very little knowledge in this area but was told the Shure SM58 is a good one.&nbsp; Should I look at Beta?&nbsp; I don&#039;t know the difference.&nbsp; She performs in singer/songwriter venues, large outdoor concerts and everything in between.&nbsp; Also, I was told to look into the Airline Synth Wireless systme and use it with the SM58.&nbsp; Does this make sense, and can you give me a suggestion as to what sytem or mic to look at.&nbsp; (Budget is a concern)&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.Thanks,&nbsp; Gary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shure Beta 58A by Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonereviews.com/wireless-microphones/shure-beta-58a.html#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.microphonereviews.com/?p=159#comment-47</guid>
		<description>You should be able to tell that we do not sell products on this website.  It&#039;s a 100% review website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should be able to tell that we do not sell products on this website.  It&#8217;s a 100% review website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shure Beta 58A by group company</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonereviews.com/wireless-microphones/shure-beta-58a.html#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>group company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.microphonereviews.com/?p=159#comment-46</guid>
		<description>&#160;
Hi,i will like to enquiry about this product,(Shure SLX 24 BETA58A Wireless or Shure BETA 57A)do you have instock?am from Australia work and lived in thailand,
then what about your payment method?its possible to pay with Australia credit card and thailand shiping address?
please let me know if its possible
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;<br />
Hi,i will like to enquiry about this product,(Shure SLX 24 BETA58A Wireless or Shure BETA 57A)do you have instock?am from Australia work and lived in thailand,<br />
then what about your payment method?its possible to pay with Australia credit card and thailand shiping address?<br />
please let me know if its possible<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

