Small dynamic mic for low frequency applications
It may not be a well-known fact, but people dance to the
kick drum. It’s the ultimate
instigator. If girls aren’t shaking what
their mamas gave ‘em, you need to take a cold, hard look at your kick drum
production. And, assuming you have a
half-decent kit, you should start with your microphone.
Luckily, Audix has made an idiot-proof line of instrument
microphones for stage or studio. The D4
is part of that line, and is not exclusive to the kick drum. Virtually any instrument that dwells in the
low-end or has lower harmonic extensions can benefit from this mic. This includes the sax, trombones, floor toms,
djembe and other deep percussion instruments.
I gave the D4 its fair beatings on stage and in the
studio. One of its shining qualities is
that it performs consistently well in both environments. I usually run it through a gate and EQ,
especially in the studio.
You might find, as I did, that the sub frequencies resonate
with this mic. I thought it was the kick
drum itself, but I didn’t hear the same noise when listening to the drum. This is good in certain regards. If you want a full-bodied kick, use the D4
without any dynamic processing and it will heavily occupy from about 30Hz up to
the 300Hz range. If you want to get the
snap and presence out of your D4, gate it and boost the 4kHz range. Be conservative with that boost, though. It can sound plastic, like tapping fingers on
the side of a soda bottle.
Another shining quality of the Audix D4 is its ability to
handle high sound pressure levels (SPLs).
This allows for different miking techniques, including the simpleton’s
favorite: dropping the mic into the kick drum.
I’ve used the D4 in this situation on stage for four years in a 22”
maple kick, and it works beautifully.
You can mount the D4 in the drum’s port with the included mic clip, but
I suggest experimenting between the two to find the right tone for your music.
Although my first preference for reed or brass is a nice
condenser mic, the Audix D4 can carry the mean low-end to which bari sax
players have sweaty dreams. If the D4 is
good enough for the horn aficionados of Tower of Power, they’re good enough for
me (and, realistically, you). If I owned
two, I would most definitely use the second one for my bari player.
For under $170, the only comparable mic for the buck is the
Shure Beta 52A. I’ve had a chance to
work with them both, and like them both.
If nothing else, the Audix D4 is a much less conspicuous
microphone. The Shure has a lower
frequency response (down to 20Hz compared to the D4’s 40Hz), but I have found
the lower end to be generally cleaner and tighter with the D4 as it gently
rolls off the bottom end.